iBach

Adam Bell Adam Bell

0 Cours inscrits • 0 Cours terminé

Biographie

High Pass Rate NCP-US-6.5 Study Materials Tool Helps You Get the NCP-US-6.5 Certification

Customers who purchased our NCP-US-6.5 study guide will enjoy one-year free update and we will send the latest one to your email once we have any updating about the NCP-US-6.5 dumps pdf. You will have enough time to practice our NCP-US-6.5 Real Questions because there are correct answers and detailed explanations in our learning materials. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions about our products.

Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Identify the steps to deploy Nutanix Files
Given a scenario, determine product and sizing parameters

Topic 2

Given a scenario, configure shares, buckets, and
or Volume Groups
Troubleshoot a failed upgrade for Files
Objects

Topic 3

Configure Nutanix Files with advanced features
Determine the appropriate method to ensure data availability
recoverability

Topic 4

Analyze and Monitor Nutanix Unified Storage
Describe the use of Data Lens for data security

Topic 5

Utilize File Analytics for data security
Troubleshoot Nutanix Unified Storage
Configure Nutanix Volumes

Topic 6

Troubleshoot issues related to Nutanix Files
Explain Data Management processes for Files and Objects

Topic 7

Configure Nutanix Objects
Describe how to monitor performance and usage

>> NCP-US-6.5 Reliable Dumps Free <<

NCP-US-6.5 Reliable Test Duration, Reliable NCP-US-6.5 Test Tutorial

FreeDumps is also offering 1 year free NCP-US-6.5 updates. You can update your NCP-US-6.5 study material for 90 days from the date of purchase. The NCP-US-6.5 updated package will include all the past questions from the past papers. You can pass the Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 Exam easily with the help of the dumps. It will have all the questions that you should cover for the Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 exam. If you are facing any issues with the products you have, then you can always contact our 24/7 support to get assistance.

Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 Sample Questions (Q30-Q35):

NEW QUESTION # 30
An administrator has deployed a new Files cluster within a Windows environment. After some days, the Files environment is not able to synchronize users with the Active Directory server anymore. The administrator observes a large time difference between the Files environment and the Active Directory server that is responsible for the behavior. How should the administrator prevent the Files environment and the AD Server from having such a time difference in the future?

A. Connect to every FSVM and edit the time manually.
B. Use 0.pool.ntp.org as the NTP Server for the AD Server.
C. Use the same NTP Servers for the Files environment and the AD Server.
D. Use 0.pool.ntp.org as the NTP Server for the Files environment.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Nutanix Files, part of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), integrates with Active Directory (AD) for user authentication and synchronization in a Windows environment. A key requirement for AD integration is that the time between the Files environment (specifically, the File Server Virtual Machines or FSVMs) and the AD server must be synchronized, as a time difference greater than 5 minutes can cause Kerberos authentication failures, leading to synchronization issues.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (Connect to every FSVM and edit the time manually): Incorrect. Manually editing the time on each FSVM is a temporary fix and not a sustainable solution. It does not prevent future time drift, as the FSVMs' clocks will continue to drift without proper synchronization.
* Option B (Use the same NTP Servers for the Files environment and the AD Server): Correct. The best way to prevent time differences is to ensure that both the Files environment (FSVMs) and the AD server use the same Network Time Protocol (NTP) servers for time synchronization. This ensures consistent timekeeping across both systems, avoiding authentication issues due to time skew.
* Option C (Use 0.pool.ntp.org as the NTP Server for the AD Server): Incorrect. While using 0.pool.
ntp.org as the NTP server for the AD server is a valid approach, it does not ensure synchronization unless the Files environment also uses the same NTP server. If the Files environment uses a different NTP server, time drift can still occur.
* Option D (Use 0.pool.ntp.org as the NTP Server for the Files environment): Incorrect. Similar to option C, using 0.pool.ntp.org for the Files environment alone does not guarantee synchronization with the AD server unless the AD server also uses the same NTP server.
Why Option B?
Time synchronization between Nutanix Files and AD is critical for Kerberos authentication, which has a default tolerance of 5 minutes. Using the same NTP servers for both the Files environment (configured at the cluster level via Prism Element) and the AD server ensures that both systems maintain the same time, preventing future synchronization issues.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Files Administration Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"For successful Active Directory integration, the time between the Nutanix Files environment and the AD server must be synchronized within a 5-minute window. To prevent time drift, configure both the Nutanix cluster (which manages FSVM time) and the AD server to use the same NTP servers. This ensures consistent timekeeping and avoids Kerberos authentication failures."
:
Nutanix Files Administration Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "Active Directory Integration" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Files AD Synchronization".

NEW QUESTION # 31
A team of developers are working on a new processing application and requires a solution where they can upload the ... code for testing API calls. Older iterations should be retained as newer code is developer and tested.

A. Provision a Volume Group and connect via iSCSI with MPIO.
B. Create an NFS Share, mounted on a Linux Server with Files.
C. Create a bucket in Objects with Versioning enabled.
D. Create an SMB Share with Files and enable Previous Version

Answer: C

Explanation:
Nutanix Objects supports versioning, which is a feature that allows multiple versions of an object to be preserved in the same bucket. Versioning can be useful for developers who need to upload their code for testing API calls and retain older iterations as newer code is developed and tested. Versioning can also provide protection against accidental deletion or overwrite of objects. Reference: Nutanix Objects Administration Guide

NEW QUESTION # 32
An administrator has received an alert A130358 - ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities with the following details:
* Block Serial Number: leswxxxxxxxx
* Alert Time: Thu Jan 19 2023 21:56:10 GMT-0800 (PST)
* Alert Type: ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities
* Alert Message: A130358:ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities
* Cluster ID: xxxxx
* Alert Body: No alert body availableWhich scenario is causing the alert and needs to be addressed to allow the entities to be protected?

A. One or more VMs or Volume Groups belonging to the Consistency Group is part of multiple Recovery Plans configured with a Witness.
B. One or more VMs or Volume Groups belonging to the Consistency Group contains stale metadata.
C. The logical timestamp for one or more of the Volume Groups is not consistent between clusters.
D. One or more VMs or Volume Groups belonging to the Consistency Group may have been deleted.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The alert A130358 - ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities in a Nutanix environment indicates an issue with a Consistency Group, which is used in Nutanix data protection to ensure that related entities (e.g., VMs, Volume Groups) are protected together in a consistent state. This alert specifically points to "stale entities," meaning there is a problem with the entities within the Consistency Group that prevents proper protection.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (One or more VMs or Volume Groups belonging to the Consistency Group contains stale metadata): Correct. The "ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities" alert is triggered when entities (e.
g., VMs or Volume Groups) in a Consistency Group have stale metadata, meaning their metadata is outdated or corrupted. This can happen due to synchronization issues, failed operations, or manual changes that leave the metadata inconsistent with the actual state of the entity. This prevents the Consistency Group from being protected properly, as the system cannot ensure consistency.
* Option B (One or more VMs or Volume Groups belonging to the Consistency Group may have been deleted): Incorrect. If an entity in a Consistency Group is deleted, a different alert would typically be triggered (e.g., related to a missing entity). The "StaleEntities" alert specifically refers to metadata issues, not deletion. However, deletion could indirectly cause metadata staleness if the deletion was not properly synchronized, but this is not the primary cause described by the alert.
* Option C (The logical timestamp for one or more of the Volume Groups is not consistent between clusters): Incorrect. Inconsistent logical timestamps between clusters would typically trigger a different alert related to replication or synchronization (e.g., in Metro Availability or NearSync scenarios). The
"StaleEntities" alert is specific to metadata issues within the Consistency Group on the local cluster, not a cross-cluster timestamp issue.
* Option D (One or more VMs or Volume Groups belonging to the Consistency Group is part of multiple Recovery Plans configured with a Witness): Incorrect. Being part of multiple Recovery Plans or using a Witness (e.g., in Metro Availability) does not directly cause a "StaleEntities" alert.
This scenario might cause other issues (e.g., conflicts in recovery operations), but it is not related to stale metadata within a Consistency Group.
Why Option A?
The "ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities" alert explicitly indicates that the entities in the Consistency Group have stale metadata, which must be resolved to allow proper protection. The administrator would need to investigate the affected VMs or Volume Groups, clear the stale metadata (e.g., by refreshing the Consistency Group or removing/re-adding the entity), and ensure synchronization with the cluster's state.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Prism Alerts Reference Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Alert A130358 - ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities: This alert is triggered when one or more entities (e.g., VMs or Volume Groups) in a Consistency Group have stale metadata, preventing the group from being protected consistently. Stale metadata can occur due to failed operations, synchronization issues, or manual changes. To resolve, identify the affected entities, clear the stale metadata, and ensure the Consistency Group is properly synchronized."
:
Nutanix Prism Alerts Reference Guide, Version 6.0, Section: "Alert A130358 - ConsistencyGroupWithStaleEntities" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Data Protection Troubleshooting".

NEW QUESTION # 33
An administrator has received an alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC with the following details:
* Block Serial Number: 16Suxxxxxxxx
* Alert Time: Thu Jan 19 2023 20:31:10 GMT-0800 (PST)
* Alert Type: VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC
* Alert Message: A130357:VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC
* Cluster ID: xxxxx
* Alert Body: Volume Group protection failed on PCWhich two conditions need to be addressed to allow successful protection of the Volume Group? (Choose two.)

A. Volume Group is not protected in a legacy protection domain.
B. The Protection Policy applied on Volume Group has a NearSync snapshot schedule applied.
C. Volume Group is protected in a legacy protection domain.
D. The Protection Policy applied on Volume Group has an Async snapshot schedule applied.

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
The alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC in a Nutanix environment indicates a failure to protect a Volume Group (VG) in a Protection Domain (PD) managed through Prism Central (PC). Nutanix Volumes, part of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), provides block storage via iSCSI, and Volume Groups can be protected using Protection Domains for snapshots and replication. The alert suggests that the protection process failed, likely due to incompatible configurations.
Understanding the Issue:
* Volume Group Protection: A Volume Group in Nutanix Volumes can be added to a Protection Domain in Prism Central for data protection (e.g., snapshots, replication).
* Protection Failed on PC: The failure occurred during the protection process, managed through Prism Central, indicating an issue with the Protection Domain or policy settings.
* Conditions to Address: The failure is likely due to configuration mismatches or unsupported settings in the Protection Domain or policy.
Analysis of Conditions:
* Option A (Volume Group is protected in a legacy protection domain): Correct. A "legacy protection domain" refers to an older protection mechanism in Nutanix (e.g., from earlier AOS versions) that may not be fully compatible with newer Prism Central features or Volume Group protection workflows. If the Volume Group is part of a legacy PD, the protection process may fail due to deprecated features or APIs. Addressing this involves migrating the Volume Group to a modern Protection Domain in Prism Central, ensuring compatibility.
* Option B (The Protection Policy applied on Volume Group has an Async snapshot schedule applied): Incorrect. An Async (asynchronous) snapshot schedule is a standard and supported configuration for Volume Group protection in a Protection Domain. Async schedules take snapshots at intervals (e.g., hourly, daily) and replicate them to a remote site, and this does not cause protection failures-it's a valid setup.
* Option C (The Protection Policy applied on Volume Group has a NearSync snapshot schedule applied): Correct. NearSync is a near-synchronous replication schedule (e.g., 1-minute RPO, as in Question 24) that is supported for VMs and some Nutanix Files configurations, but it is not supported for Volume Groups in a Protection Domain. If a NearSync schedule is applied to a Volume Group's Protection Policy, the protection will fail because Volume Groups only support Async schedules.
Addressing this involves changing the schedule to an Async policy, which is compatible with Volume Groups.
* Option D (Volume Group is not protected in a legacy protection domain): Incorrect. This option suggests that the Volume Group is already in a modern (non-legacy) Protection Domain, which would not cause the failure. The issue lies in specific conditions (e.g., legacy PD or incompatible schedule), so this option does not identify a condition that needs addressing.
Selected Conditions:
* A: A legacy Protection Domain can cause compatibility issues, leading to protection failures. Migrating to a modern PD in Prism Central resolves this.
* C: A NearSync schedule is not supported for Volume Groups, causing the protection to fail. Switching to an Async schedule ensures compatibility.
Why These Conditions?
* Legacy Protection Domain (A): Legacy PDs may use outdated mechanisms that are incompatible with Prism Central's modern protection workflows for Volume Groups, causing failures.
* NearSync Schedule (C): Volume Groups in a Protection Domain only support Async snapshot schedules. A NearSync schedule, designed for low-RPO replication, is not supported and will cause the protection process to fail.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Prism Alerts Reference Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC: This alert is triggered when Volume Group protection fails in a Protection Domain managed through Prism Central. Common causes include:
* The Volume Group is protected in a legacy protection domain, which is not fully compatible with modern Prism Central workflows. Migrate the Volume Group to a modern Protection Domain.
* The Protection Policy applied to the Volume Group has a NearSync snapshot schedule, which is not supported for Volume Groups. Change the schedule to an Async policy to allow successful protection."
:
Nutanix Prism Alerts Reference Guide, Version 6.0, Section: "Alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Volumes Administration Guide, Version 6.0, Section: "Protecting Volume Groups with Protection Domains" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Volumes Data Protection".

NEW QUESTION # 34
An organization currently has a Files cluster for their office data including all department shares. Most of the data is considered cold Data and they are looking to migrate to free up space for future growth or newer data.
The organization has recently added an additional node with more storage. In addition, the organization is using the Public Cloud for .. storage needs.
What will be the best way to achieve this requirement?

A. Backup the data using a third-party software and replicate to the cloud.
B. Setup another cluster and replicate the data with Protection Domain.
C. Enable Smart Tiering in Files within the File Console.
D. Migrate cold data from the Files to tape storage.

Answer: C

NEW QUESTION # 35
......

As we all know, the influence of NCP-US-6.5 exam guides even have been extended to all professions and trades in recent years. Passing the NCP-US-6.5 exam is not only for obtaining a paper certification, but also for a proof of your ability. Most people regard Nutanix certification as a threshold in this industry, therefore, for your convenience, we are fully equipped with a professional team with specialized experts to study and design the most applicable NCP-US-6.5 Exam prepare. We have organized a team to research and NCP-US-6.5 study question patterns pointing towards various learners.

NCP-US-6.5 Reliable Test Duration: https://www.freedumps.top/NCP-US-6.5-real-exam.html

Adam Bell Adam Bell

Biographie

Contactez-nous

Liens rapides

Ressources

Support